Health maintenance organizations (HMO's) are paid a capitated amount for enrolled Medicare beneficiaries that is 95 percent of what these enrollees would be expected to cost in the fee-for-service sector. However, it appears that HMO enrollees are less costly than other Medicare beneficiaries. With a simulation model, we demonstrate that with a 95-percent pricing rule, any significant degree of biased selection leads to increased cost to the payer, even when HMO's are cost effective compared with the fee-for-service sector. Optimal pricing percentages from the point of view of cost minimization are considerably less than 95 percent. (Summer 1987)
Health Care Financing Review
1987
Ellis RP and McGuire TG
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Setting%20Capitation%20Payments%20in%20Markets%20for%20Health%20Services