Much of the recent health care reform debate has focused on achieving budget neutrality over a 10-year period, but this goal is less important than the reform's long-run fiscal sustainability. If the rate of growth of health care spending continues to exceed the rate of income growth by its historical margin of more than 2 percentage points, the consequences for beneficiaries, federal and state budgets, and the entire economy — given the implied increase in tax rates and forgone consumption — will be dire.1 For this reason, health care reform is an economic issue as much as, if not more than, a health issue.
(January 7, 2010)
New England Journal of Medicine
2010
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=%E2%80%9CEnsuring%20the%20Fiscal%20Sustainability%20of%20Health%20Care%20Reform%E2%80%9D