BACKGROUND:
The majority of states have enacted price transparency laws to allow patients to shop for careand to prevent price discrimination of the uninsured. In California, hospitals must provide a price estimate to a requesting uninsured patient and cannot bill for an amount greater than the reimbursement the hospital would receive from a government payer.
OBJECTIVE:
To assess the response rate of California hospitals to a patient price request and to compare theprice estimates received to Medicare reimbursement.
DESIGN:
We sent letters to California acute-care hospitals from a fictional uninsured patient requesting an estimate for one of three common elective procedures: a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a hysterectomy, or routine screening colonoscopy.
PARTICIPANTS:
Three hundred and fifty-three hospitals in California.
MEASUREMENTS:
Hospital response rates, difference between price estimates received, and Medicare reimbursement for equivalent procedures.
RESULTS:
Only 28% (98/353) of hospitals responded and their response varied in content. Of the 98 responses, 15 (15%) did not provide a quote and instead asked for more information such as the billing code, 55 (56%) provided a price estimate for hospital services only, 10 (10%) included both physician and hospital services, and 18 (18%) did not specify what was covered. The median discounted price estimate was higher than Medicare reimbursement rates for all procedures: hysterectomy ($17,403 vs. $5,569; p
Journal of General Internal Medicine
2010
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Does%20price%20transparency%20legislation%20allow%20the%20uninsured%20to%20shop%20for%20care%3F